Why you need data warehouse automation
Dealing with more diverse and dispersed data than ever before
Organizations deal with more varied and dispersed data than ever before.
The most crucial data division driver is the rise of microservices and SaaS applications, each serving specific functions within modern organizations. All of them are prone to change: new releases, new instances, new services, migrations to other platforms, discontinuation of service, and so on.
It is a significant challenge to secure the continuous integration of these data from different sources and vendors into one centralized repository, even for companies with ETL mappings.
A data warehouse automation solution is designed to automate the repeatable manual tasks for ingesting data, managing data with different schema, and creating views for extraction throughout the data warehouse lifecycle.
Going beyond data integration
Data warehouse automation, done the right way, should automate as many stages as possible – from loading data to presentation - and free up time so data engineers can focus on value-creating tasks.
This guide will help you scope your evaluation so you can choose the right solution for your business now — and three years from now. You will evaluate seven significant areas: scope, standardization, productivity, agility, output quality, extensibility, and operational costs.
Scope
Automating as many stages as possible
Automation needs to cover breadth and depth, automating multi-source data integration, data modeling and ETL/DDL code generation but also integrating and modeling different data from the various microservices and SaaS applications that each serve particular functions.
Think of a CRM tool, ERP system, or IoT stream: they all produce data about specific business processes. Metadata ingestion is a prerequisite for integrating the tables, primary keys, unique keys, foreign keys, attributes and their data types (text, data, numbers, boolean) specific to each source.
Tech stack parametrization is what makes automation work in any company. No-code automation solutions enable data teams to select and specify the technologies and versions of their sources, target platform, CDC or ETL tools without coding any integration logic.
Parametrization applies to set the data integration parameters such as case-sensitive data comparison, loading logic, data quality settings, schema name options and many more.
Companies that want to set up sources as streaming sources should check if that feature is included.Everything is a repeatable pattern
Objects such as computed satellites, dimensions, facts, flat tables, etc., require more customization in code. This is where data engineers can excel. The automation paradox, however, indicates a trade-off between logic's repeatability and its customization level. That paradox is no longer valid.
Modern tools – that adhere to Data Vault standards - offer advanced users the possibility to apply automation to company-specific logic designed for presentation layers. They are allowed to build their own templates to duplicate the logic coded for objects such as computed satellites, links, custom PITs, facts, and dimensions.
Standardization
Follow Data Vault 2.0 standards
The Data Vault 2.0 methodology has rapidly become the data warehouse automation standard because it provides standardized structures.
Data Vault 2.0 modeling breaks down and consolidates source data into three core components: hubs (unique entities crucial to the business such as 'customer,' 'product,' 'store'), links (relationships between entities), and satellites (all the properties and history of an entity).
All hubs look alike, as do all links and satellites. This makes it possible to use metadata-driven approaches to automate the Enterprise Data Warehouse (EDW). The metadata describes the structure of the incoming data set and the organization's business conceptual data models. It identifies business keys, their relationships, and descriptive data to generate the CREATE TABLE and INSERT statements for all entities using templates that provide a customizable target structure.
Using templates makes it possible to generate the Data Vault model based on the same metadata to various target databases and adjust the templates to the organization's needs.
Good templates are, therefore, the foundation of a high-quality EDW. The better the templates and metadata quality, the better the generated solution's quality. The best automation tools provide built-in templates to integrate and model different data from the various sources and technologies that organizations have today.
Why you need a Data Vault 2.0 architecture
Data Vault is more than just a methodology or model. It also provides the architecture to help you implement a data warehouse that is both efficient and focused on business. Keep in mind that although there are many ways to combine and implement the methodology, model, and architecture of the Data Vault system, it's essential to abide by the standard recommendations when building a Data Vault. If Data Vault standards are not met, problems such as rework, a drop in performance, and mix-ups within the data teams will quickly arise. So it might be a good idea to check which data warehouse automation vendor has been certified by the Data Vault Alliance, the official Data Vault body.
Productivity
Accelerate development
A data warehouse (DWH) requires a great deal of upfront design and development. A lot of manual work goes into data modeling, data mapping, metadata management, etc.
All data warehouse automation solutions promise to collect the right data in the right way. But we strongly suggest identifying in detail which automation solution will allow your data teams to do the
work faster and more efficiently. Apply reverse engineering by looking at how many lines of code and how much data modeling time each automation stage or feature will exempt your teams from.
Agility
Technology & data changes will happen
Technical environments tend to change. When sources are added or technologies get upgraded, data teams ideally only have to adapt parameters and incorporate the changes in their existing target model without starting anew.
The level of abstraction that Data Vault modeling brings is specifically designed to deal with source changes without the almost mandatory rework that goes with it. On top of that, Data Vault captures the history of all source changes, which lets companies go back in time.
Do look at out-of-the-box source version management as well to support agility. Tracking different versions is not just a matter of tracking the model changes. It would help if you also accounted for the effect these changes may have on data loss.
Data migrations scripts are helpful if a change in the source data model also requires a change in the target model. Examples are migration from single to multi-master hubs, data type changes, satellite split, etc.
People and opinions change too
The human factor plays a key role as well. Automation and standardization done right guarantees that every new profile that joins your data team will build on what has been done before.
A guided setup is just essential because it forces everybody to follow the same methodology and apply the same modeling language.
What has business value today might not deliver any value tomorrow. Data Vault supports multiple versions of the truth: this allows catering to changing business definitions in the consumption area. Data Vault captures the complete change of history in the sources, giving business decision-makers the right to change their minds about business concepts and definitions or change use cases.
That is why we believe that Data Vault is a stable layer, a fortress that buffers against all kinds of changes over time.
Extensibility
Easy to integrate by design
A data warehouse automation solution is crucial to any modern data infrastructure. It, therefore, has to be easy to integrate with the ETL, CDC, governance, source, and target technologies your organization uses today.
The best automation solutions are designed for extensibility through native integration or REST APIs. The automation engine and corresponding template language must be robust in creating abstractions between integration logic and code. The smaller the percentage of the template code is target-specific, the better.
This design principle allows for frictionless integration and swift migrations in case of changes or disruptions in the data technology stack.
When a new technology gets introduced, it entails nothing more than describing the exceptions for the template interpreter. At the same time, exceptions are stored in metadata, specific SQL functions, for example, that deviate per database engine technology.
Quality of output
Eliminate technical debt
A significant issue in data warehouse development is technical debt. Technical debt can be caused by taking shortcuts or deviating from standards. Different developers write SQL code differently, which also contributes to technical debt. The constant is that it always results in costly rework.
Several DWA features combined almost eradicate technical debt:
- standardization
- extensive code generation
- no-code automation, which does away with coding errors or any inconsistencies
- Data Vault 2.0 methodology (& certification)
- automated migration scripts that solve issues with the data model that occurred in the past (wrong business key, satellite splitting, single- to multi-master conversion)
Operational costs
Manual process can get expensive
A data warehouse (DWH) requires a great deal of manual upfront design and development. This includes developing the data's integration, modeling, and quality assurance.
Hand-coded DW solutions and classical ETL development lose a lot of time in the design and build phases of the data warehouse. The entire design needs to be constructed manually; source metadata is manually incorporated into the target data model based on lengthy analysis documents. The physical data model's full details need to be manually built in classical data modeling tools. Besides being slow, these approaches are also prone to errors and costly rework.
Moving the problem doesn't help
Templates are being used to speed up the build. The problem is that the focus might shift from ETL development to template development. Good templates are hard to build and even harder to test and maintain. There is always another exception to consider. So instead of having quick results, developers build, test, share, copy, and adapt templates for a great deal of time.
The best way to mitigate this problem is to check if and how many built-in templates are provided to integrate and model different data from various sources and technologies without having to write them first. Or to put it differently, you don't want your highly paid professionals to end up solving elementary data problems instead of spending their time delivering real value.
The right way, right away
Finally, the success of the solution strongly depends on the completeness of the support, and the ability to adapt code to your environment. Not complying with standards or incomplete support will result in technical debt or, even worse, having to build part of the solution manually.
Planning for now and three years from now
Evaluating the seven areas discussed in this guide will help you and your buying team make the choice that suits your needs. Looking for the following differentiators could be the difference between a DWA solution that creates more problems than it solves and a solution that will genuinely help you accelerate analysis and data-driven decisions.
